People

Overview

Bart Seitz handles a wide range of environmental, health and safety matters, including regulatory counseling, complex litigation and transactions. He has particular experience in advising corporate and public sector clients regarding complex regulatory compliance and enforcement issues arising under the major federal environmental, health and safety statutes, including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Clean Water Act, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.

With respect to environmental counseling, Mr. Seitz regularly advises clients regarding the myriad regulatory, permitting and enforcement issues associated with consumer/industrial product stewardship, hazardous waste generation, treatment, storage and disposal; the corrective action requirements for hazardous waste facilities and underground storage tanks; wastewater discharges from various types of industrial operations; and the use, manufacture, processing and import/export of chemical substances under TSCA. Much of this work has involved analysis of complex regulatory compliance and enforcement matters confronting the owners and operators of oil and gas exploration and production facilities, pipelines, refineries, petrochemical facilities, industrial and consumer product manufacturing plants and electric generating facilities. He has handled dozens of federal and state enforcement matters involving these facilities, through alternative dispute procedures, contested case proceedings, judicial actions and settlement negotiations.

As part of his regulatory practice, Mr. Seitz additionally provides clients with significant assistance and advice regarding specific health and safety regulatory compliance and enforcement matters involving the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration's general industry standards for Process Safety Management (PSM), Hazard Communication, and Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Action Plans, among others. Through this work, he has assisted clients with assessing their compliance with particular OSHA standards, worked with OSHA experts to develop improved compliance programs for individual facilities, participated in detailed assessments of various corporations' PSM compliance and performance, and defended clients in OSHA enforcement proceedings.

In addition to his regulatory counseling experience, Mr. Seitz represents clients in high-stakes environmental litigation and toxic tort cases in both federal and state court, including environmental cost recovery and contribution actions under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) law and state analogs. This work has involved both prosecuting and defending against claims alleging property damage and personal injury due to the impacts of hazardous substances such as per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), lead, pesticides and numerous industrial chemicals. He also has provided counsel on the rigorous environmental investigation and cleanup requirements for contaminated PFAS, PCB and RCRA hazardous waste sites, and various other impacted properties under TSCA, RCRA, CERCLA and numerous state voluntary cleanup programs. Based on his extensive environmental experience, Mr. Seitz additionally regularly advises clients on managing the environmental liabilities associated with corporate acquisitions, sales, restructurings, and related due diligence matters.

Admission & Affiliations

  • District of Columbia Bar
  • Board Member, Editorial Advisory Board for Environmental Claims Journal, 2011-present
  • J.D., George Washington University Law School 1987
  • A.B., Economics & History, College of William and Mary 1981

Experience

  • United States v. Hammond Sanitary District – Defended international consumer products company in Clean Water Act enforcement action seeking cleanup of contaminated river sediments, ultimately received a settlement for less than 10 percent of Government's initial claim
  • Solutia v. McWane – Lead litigation counsel for former cast iron foundry owner in a $14M CERCLA cost recovery action alleging client responsibility for PCB and lead contamination of residential properties, parks and downstream waterways; received dismissal all of all claims on summary judgment, which was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • In re ASARCO LLC – Environmental co-counsel for debtor, responsible for contesting >$6.5B in U.S. Government and creditor claims for cleanup costs and/or natural resource damages at large former mining or smelting sites in Idaho, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas
  • Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United States – Co-counsel in CERCLA and contract actions against the United States seeking recovery of cleanup costs associated with wartime-era contamination of oil refineries used to produce aviation gas and other products for the Government
  • Andritz Sprout-Bauer v. Beazer East – Litigation counsel in CERCLA cost recovery and contribution actions against former owners of contaminated industrial manufacturing facilities in Pennsylvania and Virginia; received settlement recovery of $8M in costs
  • United States v. OXY USA Inc. – Co-defense counsel against federal and state claims seeking performance of future cleanup activities for >10,000-acre former mining site and downstream river; settlement included EPA waiver of nearly $10M in past costs and federal PRP agreement to fund significant share of future work
  •  Lead litigation counsel on behalf of several clients, including those engaged in petroleum refining, chemical manufacturing, oilfield services, metal finishing, and consumer products manufacturing, in defending against federal and state claims seeking recovery of past agency costs and cleanup of Superfund sites in western Michigan, northern and southern California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Texas
  • Numerous clients – advising on regulatory and liability risks associated with state orders requiring investigation and potential cleanup of PFAS, and related emerging federal/state requirements for PFAS
  • Global conglomerate – oversaw pre-sale environmental due diligence and advised on contract negotiations for divestiture of company's soap and detergent manufacturing and industrial chemicals units
  • Private equity firm – advised on environmental due diligence and liability risks associated with $100 M stock deal for wood products manufacturing firm, including seven (7) operating facilities
  • Independent power producer – defended challenges to federal/state air permits for multiple natural gas-fired, combined-cycle merchant power plants before regional and state permitting authorities, and before the U.S. Environmental Appeals Board
  • Major manufacturing concern – defended the company against tort and contract claims alleging that its wastewater discharges had damaged the local sewer collection and treatment system; this case was settled prior to trial on favorable terms
  • Petroleum refiner – advised and defended client in responding to OSHA actions in a workplace injury investigation and enforcement proceeding
  • Several consumer product manufacturers – advise and assist on compliance and enforcement matters arising under federal/state requirements for hazardous substances within products, product labeling and disclosures, chemical content restrictions and product take-back and recycling obligations
  • International musical instrument and electronic component manufacturer – provided legal advice and assistance throughout the multi-year process of preparing, documenting and implementing the client's environmental, health and safety management system at two U.S. domestic facilities, including obtaining third-party registration
  • Regional water and sewer authority – defended this client against personal injury and medical monitoring claims based on alleged exposure to noxious fumes and improperly treated wastewater, received dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims in federal district court
  • Numerous manufacturing and energy sector clients – prepared and submitted voluntary written disclosures of environmental regulatory violations pursuant to federal and state environmental audit programs, and negotiated favorable settlements under which the clients were assessed either no penalties whatsoever, or substantially reduced penalties
  • Northeastern U.S. pipeline company – provided legal advice and regulatory assistance for the relevant environmental requirements for a major pipeline expansion project in New York, including water quality certification/conditions, stormwater permitting/management, environmental restoration and related matters
  • International petroleum pipeline project – provided advice and assistance in the drafting of a comprehensive set of national environmental regulatory decrees to govern the construction and operation of a 660-mile long oil pipeline
  •  Several energy company clients – conduct analysis of federal/state environmental reviews, wetlands jurisdiction and permitting issues and other environmental permit requirements and related governmental reviews/approvals for major new pipeline projects
  • International metal poles and products manufacturer – provide advice on a wide range of complex, sophisticated regulatory issues involving the interpretation of RCRA requirements for the generation, treatment, storage and/or disposal of hazardous waste
  • U.S. specialty chemicals manufacturer – supply regulatory counseling on obligations under applicable OSHA standards; assistance with a PSM audit and development of appropriate corrective measures


Awards and Community

Recognized as a Washington D.C. Super Lawyer, 2014-2019