Litigation Matters

• Quartz Auto Technologies, LLC v. Grubhub Holdings Inc. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) – defense of Grubhub in a patent infringement action
• In the Matter of Certain Artificial Eyelash Extension Systems, Products, and Components Thereof (United States International Trade Commission) – defense of KISS, Walmart, CVS, and Ulta in an infringement investigation of Lashify’s patents
• Greatgigz Solutions, LLC v. Grubhub Holdings Inc. (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas) – defense of Grubhub in a patent infringement action
• SVV Technology Innovations v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas) – defense of Samsung against allegations of infringement of patents asserted against LED TVs and monitors
• ClearPlay Inc. v. DISH Network L.L.C. (United States District Court for the District of Utah) – defense of DISH in a patent infringement action involving DVR technology
• Clear-Vu Lighting v. Apogee Lighting, Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York) – assertion of Clear-Vu's patents relating to LED lighting systems against Apogee
• In the Matter of Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same (II) (United States International Trade Commission) – assertion of Fujifilm's patents relating to magnetic recording media against Sony
• In the Matter of Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof (United States International Trade Commission) – defense of Fujifilm in an infringement investigation of Sony's patents asserted against magnetic recording media
• In the Matter of Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same (United States International Trade Commission) – assertion of Fujifilm's patents relating to magnetic recording media against Sony
• Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas) – defense of Samsung against allegations of infringement of patents asserted against MMS, turbo coding, home automation, and cellular infrastructure equipment
• Nalco Company v. Ashland Inc. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) – defense of Ashland in a patent infringement action involving chemical mixers in pulp processing plants
• Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC (United States District Court for the District of Delaware) – defense of AT&T in a patent infringement action involving SMS and MMS technology
• Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas) – defense of Samsung in a patent infringement action involving USB technology
• Ameranth, Inc. v. Grubhub, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California) – defense of Grubhub in a patent infringement action involving internet-based ordering systems
• Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas) – defense of Samsung against allegations of infringement of patents related to antenna technology
• Agere Systems, Inc. v. Sony Corporation (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas) – assertion of Agere’s patents relating to semiconductor manufacturing
• Kara Technology Incorporated v. Stamps.com Inc. (United States District Court for the Central District of California) – assertion of Kara Technology’s patents related to Internet postage products
• Honeywell International Inc. v. Renesas Technology Corp. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas) – defense of Renesas in a patent infringement action involving liquid crystal display drivers
• CEA v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (United States District Court for the District of Delaware) – defense of Samsung against allegations of infringement of patents related to liquid crystal displays
• Lexar Media, Inc. v. Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) – defense of Fujifilm against allegations of infringement of patents involving flash memory systems
• Overture Services, Inc. v. FindWhat.com, Inc. (United States District Court for the Central District of California) – defense of FindWhat.com, a provider of Internet search and advertising services, in a patent infringement action
• Safety Syringes, Inc. v. Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California) – defense of Aventis in a patent infringement suit involving safety devices for prefilled medical syringes
• Pro bono representation of impoverished mothers and children in family court proceedings in various courts of the State of New York, including: Bronx, New York, Kings, and Queens Family Court; Bronx Supreme Court; and the Second Department of the Appellate Division

IP Counseling, Patent Prosecution, and Post-Grant Proceedings

• Vidyo, Inc. – intellectual property counseling and the prosecution and management of a worldwide patent portfolio directed to audiovisual compression and transmission
• Columbia University – patent prosecution matters
• MasterCard Incorporated – intellectual property counseling and patent prosecution matters
• Simple Works, Inc. – intellectual property counseling and patent prosecution matters
• Liberty Media – counseling and due diligence regarding intellectual property issues
• Samsung Electronics Co. – representation in inter partes review proceedings
• Fujifilm Corporation – representation in inter partes review proceedings